The role of regions is clear now, but how do you assess the help of the federal authorities provided to the travel industry?
Perhaps, for the first time we've noticed the work of the Federal Agency for Tourism not only in the segment of control, as it has always been, but also in the development sphere. Most of the charter programs of 2020 were launched only due to the fact that Rostourism has obtained subsidies for them. In addition, the Agency helped to establish a dialogue between tour operators and local companies, to find their common interests. This is essential, as the business itself is scattered, each has its own commercial goals, it is difficult to unite in such a way that the territory begins to grow explosively. In general, the last half year trend is that tourism-related topics make up a significant percentage of the news flow that comes from the authorities. That's great! Obviously something might not work out the first time, for some projects you have to put a lot of effort - from legislative to economic. But I don't think that anyone will doubt the benefit of the cashback program, let's say. It attracted tourists, gave money to regions and businesses in difficult times. As any new project developed in time trouble, it has some rough edges. However, the project took place and worked out twice, it means a lot.
Rostourism has a clear understanding of the business problems associated with increasing the flow, and options for their solution as well. For example, the lack of quality accommodation facilities in the regions. The regulator began to drive the topic of glampings - cheap and easily constructed buildings that can be placed where it is not possible to build a stationary object. This is a profitable story for business, it received a serious development in 2020. From my point of view, this is also the Agency's achievement.
Another tool for real business support, which was used by the Federal Agency for Tourism, is a competition for awarding grants for tourism projects. Not everything went smoothly here either, but the main thing is that the topic was not discussed behind the scenes for the first time, and all the market participants really knew about it, everyone could take part. As a result, even relatively small projects received money from the state. This is a very cool story! Three million RUB for the route or object development is a lot of money for a small regional entrepreneur. And for the country the whole program is a penny. Undoubtedly, it needs to be more transparent and elaborated, but the most important thing is that this support has already helped many people.
Alexey, is there a chance for those regions that did not manage to make such a big leap forward during the pandemic to do it in the next year or two? Tour operators' air resources are limited, and in order to deliver charters, they need to understand if they can increase demand, and the local infrastructure can withstand an organized flow.
I would not rely on operators and charters only, in fact, interregional tourism has been and will remain the leading one in such a large country as Russia. Our key suppliers of tourists are neighboring regions, and the main transport is cars and trains. For example, in Altai, 90% of travelers in 2019 and about 80% in 2020 arrived by car from Siberia.
It is clear that tour operators are launching flight programs to those regions where a large tourist flow is guaranteed. Why did everything work out with charters to Buryatia? Because of Baikal, which is known all over the country. I doubt such a charter program to the Chelyabinsk region, for example, would be successful, there is no such brand. All in all, new flights can be launched successfully to «wow»-places: Baikal in Buryatia, the Black Sea in Sochi, Sheregesh in Novokuznetsk. Mass tour operators will not enter every region, and in fact not all the regions need charters - the target audience of the majority is nearby, in neighboring regions.